Jami is a good choice for secure phone calls over the Internet, as long as the people on the call are also using Jami. It also allows teleconferencing and videoconferencing, but strangely no text-based chatrooms yet, as the developers are trying to make these fully decentralized. Jami enables secure text, voice and video communication over the Internet. Originally developed for telephony (audio / audio and video / audio and video in groups, depending on the operating system), but text messaging is also possible text-based chat rooms are being worked on. More information: > here “Ring” -> “Jami”. negative: ONLY usable on PC/laptop - NOT on smartphones.decentralization: direct/ mesh (P2P, no separate servers).Sends to ALL participants, only the recipient can decrypt and read message (no sender/recipient address). negative: the protocol (external) is not yet properly documented!.positive: uses Signal protocol for encryption.
Bitmessage echo server android#
Regardless of the solution used, the app “Oversec” can also be used on Android devices.
OverviewĪlso “serverless” are LAN messenger, but they cover a completely different use case. They are enormously helpful and therefore worth their weight in gold. Good translations make a product in general (here: Messenger) interesting and accessible to the masses, because you save many interested people/users unnecessary translation effort. Information should be understood by every native speaker and unnecessary misunderstandings due to insufficient translations should be avoided. Why? It would be arrogant to assume that “everyone” understands English or even to demand basic knowledge. In the following overview, a German website is rated as positive and a lack of German-language information as negative.
Bitmessage echo server Offline#
delivery of offline messages is not possible without an additional intermediate station (“mailbox”).multi-device capability is extremely difficult to realize in P2P systems without additional servers as intermediate stations.battery consumption on mobile devices is higher than with server-based systems.Mesh/P2P systems can usually be used without costs (don’t forget donations/development orders!).Even though little information has been collected on some of these, they should not be neglected.Īgain and again “P2P” and “anonymous” will jump in the eye in the following - in addition the following explanations: P2P / Anonymity. In addition to the systems listed in system comparison, there are many other interesting projects, a few of which are listed here. Serverless Messenger systems (“abandonment”) are completely decentralized and organized without servers.Server-supported Messengersystems (“possibility”) basically work without servers - however, servers can be used for special functions (like buffering of messages).for contact list, message forwarding, groups or chat room management. Server-based Messengersystems (“condition”) need appropriate servers for usage - e.g.Reading time: 11 minutes / whole rubric: 17 minutes.
0 kommentar(er)
